# git-clone still broken wrt. unpacking working tree with http transport

4 messages from 2008-06-05 to 2008-06-06. Participants: Kevin Ballard, Jeff King, Junio C Hamano.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/13822

## Kevin Ballard, 2008-06-05 23:48

Subject: git-clone still broken wrt. unpacking working tree with http transport
Message-ID: <0F5C1FC7-258E-44A4-9FE6-AB6696D0B5BE@rapleaf.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/0F5C1FC7-258E-44A4-9FE6-AB6696D0B5BE%40rapleaf.com

```
The new builtin git-clone is still broken in that it doesn't unpack  
the working tree if the clone happened over http.

To test, just go ahead and clone <http://moonbase.rydia.net/software/optimized-locking/optimized-locking.git/ 
 >.

-Kevin Ballard

-- 
Kevin Ballard
kevin@rapleaf.com

```

## Jeff King, 2008-06-06 06:14

Subject: Re: git-clone still broken wrt. unpacking working tree with http transport
Message-ID: <20080606061428.GF18257@sigill.intra.peff.net>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20080606061428.GF18257%40sigill.intra.peff.net
In-Reply-To: <0F5C1FC7-258E-44A4-9FE6-AB6696D0B5BE@rapleaf.com>

```
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 04:48:56PM -0700, Kevin Ballard wrote:

> The new builtin git-clone is still broken in that it doesn't unpack the 
> working tree if the clone happened over http.

Did you try with a git that contains 541fc218?

-Peff

```

## Kevin Ballard, 2008-06-06 23:28

Subject: Re: git-clone still broken wrt. unpacking working tree with http transport
Message-ID: <32A340A4-BB0C-4D0E-9B8D-A4FCEA4B24D1@rapleaf.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/32A340A4-BB0C-4D0E-9B8D-A4FCEA4B24D1%40rapleaf.com
In-Reply-To: <20080606061428.GF18257@sigill.intra.peff.net>

```
No I didn't. I guess it's just bad luck that 541fc218 was committed a  
few hours before I reported the issue ;) I generally git-pull in the  
morning, so I pulled before that got committed.

Actually, I ran into it last week but forgot to mention it then.

-Kevin

On Jun 5, 2008, at 11:14 PM, Jeff King wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 04:48:56PM -0700, Kevin Ballard wrote:
>
>> The new builtin git-clone is still broken in that it doesn't unpack  
>> the
>> working tree if the clone happened over http.
>
> Did you try with a git that contains 541fc218?
>
> -Peff
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Kevin Ballard
kevin@rapleaf.com

```

## Junio C Hamano, 2008-06-06 23:30

Subject: Re: git-clone still broken wrt. unpacking working tree with http transport
Message-ID: <7vve0mqgz9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vve0mqgz9.fsf%40gitster.siamese.dyndns.org
In-Reply-To: <32A340A4-BB0C-4D0E-9B8D-A4FCEA4B24D1@rapleaf.com>

```
Kevin Ballard <kevin@rapleaf.com> writes:

> No I didn't. I guess it's just bad luck that 541fc218 was committed a
> few hours before I reported the issue ;) I generally git-pull in the
> morning, so I pulled before that got committed.
>
> Actually, I ran into it last week but forgot to mention it then.

That's Ok.  I tried this locally and it seems to work ;-)

```
