Re: [egit / jgit] Implementation of a file tree iteration using ignore rules.
Florian Kberle <FloriansKarten@web.de> wrote:
>
> I like the idea of a Java implementation of git and would like to
> contribute to the jgit/egit project.
Even better, we'd love to have you contribute! :-)
> In order to get familiar with the code I started to implement a command
> like tool which works like git using the jgit library. I implemented
> very simple versions of the commands "help", "init"
This is an interesting start. Did you see the existing "Main" class in org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/pgm? It sets up and invokes a TextBuiltin, which is sort of like the "Command" class you added in your first patch. Though TextBuiltins are created on-the-fly and thus are harder/impossible to use to format a "jgit help".
I think your approach of building up a table of commands is likely the better one long term, so I am interested in seeing the two unify, taking the best from each (from Main and MainProgram that is).
Please note that jgit is restricted to Java 5 APIs only right now. The "MainProgram" class you introduced uses Arrays.copyOfRange() which does not compile under Java 5. I guess it is new in Java 6?
> and finally wanted
> to implement the "add" command. However, I didn't find any tools to
> determine the files which should be added.
Right. We haven't implemented this properly yet. So I am very happy to see someone starting to approach this.
> So I implemented a factory which returns an Iterable<File> for the
> iteration over all the files in a directory.
Sadly this is a reimplementation of the already existing FileTreeIterator, which is meant to be used within a TreeWalk instance.
The TreeWalk API is meant to iterate over a working directory in canonical tree entry name ordering, so that we can walk not just a working directory but also the index file and one or more tree objects in parallel. We can even walk multiple working directories at once making directory differencing fairly simple.
What is missing here is really two things:
#1) Take .gitignore and .git/info/exclude (and other patterns) into
account as WorkingTreeIterator (base class of FileTreeIterator)
loops over the entries in a directory. Since .gitignore can be per-directory we may need to add rules
as we enter into a subtree (createSubtreeIterator method)
and pop rules as we exit a subtree. Fortunately the pop part is easy if the rules are held within
the WorkingTreeIterator as instance members as pop is already
dealt with up inside of TreeWalk by simply discarding the
subtree instance and returning back to the parent instance. #2) Be able to edit one (or more) index files during a
TreeWalk. I am (sort of) in the middle of that work on my
egit/spearce.git fork's dircache branch.We already have a method for filtering entries during TreeWalk; its the TreeFilter API and its many subclasses. I wonder if the rules for say .gitignore could simply be implemented through this API and then allow a TreeFilter to be set directly on the WorkingTreeIterator to "pre-filter" the entries before they get returned for merging in the TreeWalk main loop.
I am certain we need to write new subclasses of TreeFilter to handle fnmatch(3C) style glob rules. But they shouldn't be too difficult. For example we already have PathFilter to perform equality testing on path names.
Building onto TreeFilter makes for some more interesting cases, as we can then feed globs into the revision machinary and actually do something like `jgit log -- 'path/*.c'`, with the globbing being done _on_the_fly_ at each tree, and not once up front by the shell.
Show 11 quoted lines
> For an example see the unit test testRealisticExample() in the class
> FileIterableFactoryForAddCommandTest:
> http://repo.or.cz/w/egit/florian.git?a=blob;f=org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/lib/fileiteration/FileIterableFactoryForAddCommandTest.java;h=d3c78f4422c708f26ccb56434053bb711fa3116b;hb=669fd814d34e2f989b5f8eedbcb0d5bcf9743ce7
>
> You can view the patches online at:
> http://repo.or.cz/w/egit/florian.git?a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/mailinglist-patches-0
>
> I signed all patches and formatted them with the code formatter as I
> should. It's ok for me to put the patches under a dual license between a
> 3-clause BSD and the EPL[*3*]. Currently all files have a GPL 2 notice.
> I hope that is ok.
Thanks.
I'll be writing a script to edit the headers to switch GPL notice to
EDL (3-clause BSD) notice real soon, and apply it to the bleeding
edge tree. We may need to use it a few times to cover everyone's
topic branches before they merge into the main tree.
> If you want I will send the patches to the mailing list, but I don't
> know any automated way to create all the emails. I am not even sure if I
> will get them formatted correctly with Thunderbird 2. It would be cool
> if you could tell me how to send patches via command line.
I think the command you are looking for is `git send-email`.
--
Shawn.
