# [PATCH] debian/ binary package dependency fix. 3 messages from 2005-07-25 to 2005-07-25. Participants: Junio C Hamano, Andreas Jellinghaus [c]. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/1334 ## Junio C Hamano, 2005-07-25 06:27 Subject: [PATCH] debian/ binary package dependency fix. Message-ID: <7vackbz9g5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vackbz9g5.fsf%40assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ``` Make sure that the binary debian package depends on shlibs it uses. This point was raised by Alexey Nezhdanov. The "Depends:" line in debian/control lacked ${shlibs:Depends}, which caused the resulting binary package not to depend on libcurl3 nor even libc6 ;-). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano Acked-by: Ryan Anderson --- diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: git-core Architecture: any -Depends: ${misc:Depends}, shellutils, diff, rsync, rcs +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, shellutils, diff, rsync, rcs Description: The git content addressable filesystem GIT comes in two layers. The bottom layer is merely an extremely fast and flexible filesystem-based database designed to store directory trees ``` ## Andreas Jellinghaus [c], 2005-07-25 08:52 Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian/ binary package dependency fix. [u] Message-ID: <200507251052.37618.aj@dungeon.inka.de> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/200507251052.37618.aj%40dungeon.inka.de In-Reply-To: <7vackbz9g5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> ``` rsync should be Recommended: or Suggested: only, as git can be used local only as well, and then rsync is not needed, right? Regards, Andreas ``` ## Junio C Hamano, 2005-07-25 16:27 Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian/ binary package dependency fix. [u] Message-ID: <7vek9mrgv6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vek9mrgv6.fsf%40assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net In-Reply-To: <200507251052.37618.aj@dungeon.inka.de> ``` "Andreas Jellinghaus [c]" writes: > rsync should be Recommended: or Suggested: only, > as git can be used local only as well, and then > rsync is not needed, right? I suspect we still use rsync even in some local cases (rsync between two local directories). At least we once used to and I do not remeber touching that piece of code.. ```