# [PATCH] Add otherwise missing --strict option to unpack-objects summary. 2 messages from 2008-04-23 to 2008-04-23. Participants: Jon Loeliger, Junio C Hamano. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/13234 ## Jon Loeliger, 2008-04-23 21:14 Subject: [PATCH] Add otherwise missing --strict option to unpack-objects summary. Message-ID: <1208985270-27147-1-git-send-email-jdl@freescale.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/1208985270-27147-1-git-send-email-jdl%40freescale.com ``` Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger --- The option --pack_header= is also not documented here and in git-fetch-pack (others?), but it seems like that might have been intentional? It look like it is the pack header version number and object count. Dunno. Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt b/Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt index 3697896..50947c5 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ git-unpack-objects - Unpack objects from a packed archive SYNOPSIS -------- -'git-unpack-objects' [-n] [-q] [-r] URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7v1w4ws060.fsf%40gitster.siamese.dyndns.org In-Reply-To: <1208985270-27147-1-git-send-email-jdl@freescale.com> ``` Jon Loeliger writes: > The option --pack_header= is also not documented here > and in git-fetch-pack (others?), but it seems like that > might have been intentional? It is pretty much an implementation detail of an internal communication between fetch-pack and unpack-objects. The option would help anybody who wants to create an alternative implementation of fetch-pack but otherwise won't be of much use. ```