# (unknown)

1 messages from 2005-07-23 to 2005-07-23. Participants: Junio Hamano.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/1320

## Junio Hamano, 2005-07-23 09:10

Subject: (unknown)
Message-ID: <7vek9phorr.fsf@totally-fudged-out-message-id>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vek9phorr.fsf%40totally-fudged-out-message-id

```
>From nobody Sat Jul 23 02:08:27 2005
To: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add git-find-new-files to spot files added to the tree,
 but not the repository
Bcc: junkio@cox.net
References: <20050723074219.GB3255@mythryan2.michonline.com>
From: Junio C Hamano <junio@twinsun.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 02:10:51 -0700
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com> writes:

> Add git-find-new-files to find files that are in the tree, but
> not checked into the repository.

You _ought_ to be able to just say:

 $ git-ls-files --others --exclude-from=<exclude pattern file>

and be done with it.  Also please see the thread about Cogito
and StGIT's use of .gitignore and .git/exclude files.

The current implementation of "git-ls-files" exclude mechanism
may have rooms for improvements; the last time I checked, it
only did the matching of patterns against filename without
leading directories).  The world will be a better place if
somebody extends it, instead of working around its limitation.

I may be tempted to doing it myself, but I'm in the middle of
something else, so ...

> +#	find . -name .git -type d -prune -o -type f -print \
> +#		| grep -v -e .tree1 -e .tree2 \
> +#		| sed -e "s/^\.\///" \
> +#		| sort >.tree1
> +#	git-ls-files | grep -v -e .tree1 -e .tree2 \
> +#		| sort >.tree2
> +#	diff -u .tree1 .tree2

It does not matter since the above is just an example and I
think you should be able to just use "ls-files --others", but
just FYI, you could have written "comm -23 .tree1 .tree2" above
instead of "diff -u".

```