# Fwd: Bug in StackedGit 6 messages from 2008-04-15 to 2008-04-15. Participants: Vitaly V. Ch, Karl Hasselström, Catalin Marinas. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/13120 ## Vitaly V. Ch, 2008-04-15 10:06 Subject: Fwd: Bug in StackedGit Message-ID: <6efe08af0804150306x1075970cxd6c9bed3dd0a6394@mail.gmail.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/6efe08af0804150306x1075970cxd6c9bed3dd0a6394%40mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: <6efe08af0804150301t9f4a1dbte564902736ebc302@mail.gmail.com> ``` after stg commit all patch history is loss. It's sucks. there are nothing lost in bzr loom . \\wbr Vitaly Chernookiy ``` ## Karl Hasselström, 2008-04-15 10:38 Subject: Re: Fwd: Bug in StackedGit Message-ID: <20080415103854.GA31188@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20080415103854.GA31188%40diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk In-Reply-To: <6efe08af0804150306x1075970cxd6c9bed3dd0a6394@mail.gmail.com> ``` On 2008-04-15 10:06:43 +0000, Vitaly V. Ch wrote: > after stg commit all patch history is loss. It's sucks. there are > nothing lost in bzr loom . I assume you refer to the patch history shown by "stg log"? I'm working on a new and improved patch log/undo thingy for StGit, which doesn't lose the history of your patches when they are deleted. Thanks to constructive feedback such as this, it'll be completed in no time. ;-) -- Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com www.treskal.com/kalle ``` ## Vitaly V. Ch, 2008-04-15 10:46 Subject: Re: Fwd: Bug in StackedGit Message-ID: <6efe08af0804150346u4e3fc383y90dca9a723818d63@mail.gmail.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/6efe08af0804150346u4e3fc383y90dca9a723818d63%40mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20080415103854.GA31188@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> ``` On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Karl Hasselström wrote: > On 2008-04-15 10:06:43 +0000, Vitaly V. Ch wrote: > > > after stg commit all patch history is loss. It's sucks. there are > > nothing lost in bzr loom . > > I assume you refer to the patch history shown by "stg log"? Yes. There are sometimes sens to revert some patch after commit to previous version. \\wbr Vitaly Chernookiy > > I'm working on a new and improved patch log/undo thingy for StGit, > which doesn't lose the history of your patches when they are deleted. > Thanks to constructive feedback such as this, it'll be completed in no > time. ;-) > > -- > Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com > www.treskal.com/kalle > ``` ## Catalin Marinas, 2008-04-15 11:13 Subject: Re: Bug in StackedGit Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/b0943d9e0804150413h5268532ey2f2ee33fca1be783%40mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: <6efe08af0804150301t9f4a1dbte564902736ebc302@mail.gmail.com> ``` On 15/04/2008, Vitaly V. Ch wrote: > after stg commit all patch history is loss. It's sucks. Why do you need the patch history after "stg commit"? This command is meant to take the patches out of StGIT control and freeze them in the Git repository history. -- Catalin ``` ## Vitaly V. Ch, 2008-04-15 11:21 Subject: Re: Bug in StackedGit Message-ID: <6efe08af0804150421p2d3dfbd2uf327c933b385bc38@mail.gmail.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/6efe08af0804150421p2d3dfbd2uf327c933b385bc38%40mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: ``` I want revert some patch to one of previous version like I can do same in bzr loom. \\wbr Vitaly Chernookiy On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On 15/04/2008, Vitaly V. Ch wrote: > > after stg commit all patch history is loss. It's sucks. > > Why do you need the patch history after "stg commit"? This command is > meant to take the patches out of StGIT control and freeze them in the > Git repository history. > > -- > Catalin > ``` ## Karl Hasselström, 2008-04-15 11:55 Subject: Re: Fwd: Bug in StackedGit Message-ID: <20080415115545.GA32149@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20080415115545.GA32149%40diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk In-Reply-To: <6efe08af0804150346u4e3fc383y90dca9a723818d63@mail.gmail.com> ``` On 2008-04-15 10:46:38 +0000, Vitaly V. Ch wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Karl Hasselström > wrote: > > > On 2008-04-15 10:06:43 +0000, Vitaly V. Ch wrote: > > > > > after stg commit all patch history is loss. It's sucks. there > > > are nothing lost in bzr loom . > > > > I assume you refer to the patch history shown by "stg log"? > > Yes. There are sometimes sens to revert some patch after commit to > previous version. That use case (resetting a single patch to any previous version, even if the patch has since been committed or deleted) is handled (albeit in a somewhat unpolished form) by the code in my experimental branch since about 12 hours ago. Just in time. :-) -- Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com www.treskal.com/kalle ```