Re: how to use two bare repositories?
Just adding a further question:
Apparently bare repositories are strange things, which perhaps are not really supported by git. Alright, then I use additionally a real repository C.
Now in the automated process of package generation, the user of my library gets always a clone of C, created by
git clone --no-hardlinks path-to-C
However having the origin C built into that clone is not really useful, since no user has access to C. The natural think to do would be to use instead
git clone --no-hardlinks --origin http:address-of-B path-to-C
but unfortunately
git complains that "http:address-of-B" is not suitable as an origin??
However "http:address-of-B" works for pull ?
If option "origin" doesn't work, how else is it possible to provide the package-clone with a sensible default value for the pull-operation (this can only be B here)?
Oliver
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:22:05PM +0100, Oliver Kullmann wrote:
Show 29 quoted lines
> Hi,
>
> I have the following problem:
>
> We use a public repository, a bare repository A,
> used with push and pull via ssh.
> A is only to be used by the core developer group.
>
> Now I want to create another public repository B,
> from which anonymous pull is possible via http.
> So B should be another bare repository.
>
> The problem is now that it seems not to be possible
> to update B:
>
> 1. pulling from A is not possible since B is bare;
> 2. fetching from A seems to work, checking the content of
> B via gitk seems to indicate that B has been updated
> --- however pulling from B doesn't work: The newly
> fetched changes are not transported to a repository
> which pulls from B ???
>
> Hope somebody can shed light on this behaviour.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Oliver
>
> --