Re: integrity of a repository
Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> I am aware that git provides integrity of a commit (and thus, a branch
> head) via its sha, which covers both the tree and its history.
>
> But what about the integrity of a git repository as a whole?
>
> For example, if I have a set of branches, create a file listing
> branchname sha-of-head
>
> for each such branch, and hash that file, and also 'git gc --prune',
> can I then be sure that not only does the repository contain exactly
> what I want (namely all history of all branches), but also that it does
> not contain any other material (say, stuff that may not be disclosed)?
>
> Would I need the in file listing all local and remote branches?
> What about all heads in .git/*HEAD (such as FETCH_HEAD)?
That's an incoherent question ;-) First you talk about snapshotting all the refs, as if you would want to make sure you can detect anybody moving the tips of branches after that happens, but then you talk about something completely unrelated.
A freestanding git repository with a work tree consists of a set of refs (that includes your local branches in refs/heads, tags in refs/tags, and remote tracking branches refs/remotes but not limited to these three categories. Anything under refs/ is a ref by definition, and it includes the stash), reflogs, the index, HEAD (which is typically a pointer into refs/heads/ somewhere but can directly be pointing at a commit), and an object store. An object store of a repository that is not corrupt contains all objects that are reachable from refs, reflogs, the index and the HEAD, and "gc --prune" will remove everything else.
So the answer to the question in your later part of the message is that:
- FETCH_HEAD, ORIG_HEAD and MERGE_HEAD do not protect anything from
getting pruned;
- Objects that are not reachable from the tip of branches will remain in
the object store after pruning, if they are reachable from non-branch
refs (e.g. tags and the stash), reflogs, or the index.
