# [PATCH] Fix 'git remote show' regression on empty repository in 1.5.4

2 messages from 2008-03-04 to 2008-03-04. Participants: Shawn O. Pearce, Junio C Hamano.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/12484

## Shawn O. Pearce, 2008-03-04 06:00

Subject: [PATCH] Fix 'git remote show' regression on empty repository in 1.5.4
Message-ID: <20080304060036.GA17106@spearce.org>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20080304060036.GA17106%40spearce.org

```
Back in 18f7c51c we switched git-ls-remote/git-peek-remote to
use the transport backend, rather than do everything itself.

As part of that switch we started to produce a non-zero exit
status if no refs were received from the remote peer, which
happens when the remote peer has no commits pushed to it yet.
(E.g. "git --git-dir=foo.git init; git ls-remote foo.git")

Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
---

 This patch is built against `maint`.

 It will cause a merge conflict against `master` as there is a
 change there to invoke transport_disconnect(transport) before
 displaying the refs.

 Since the disconnect patch is not in maint, but this is a current
 regression in 1.5.4.3, I'm sending you a conflicting patch.  :)

 As far as resolving this when it merges to master, the return value
 of transport_disconnect() is probably what should be checked to
 signal a non-zero exit status to the caller, not the empty ref list.

 builtin-ls-remote.c |    4 ----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin-ls-remote.c b/builtin-ls-remote.c
index 6dd31d1..720280e 100644
--- a/builtin-ls-remote.c
+++ b/builtin-ls-remote.c
@@ -94,10 +94,6 @@ int cmd_ls_remote(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 		transport_set_option(transport, TRANS_OPT_UPLOADPACK, uploadpack);
 
 	ref = transport_get_remote_refs(transport);
-
-	if (!ref)
-		return 1;

```

## Junio C Hamano, 2008-03-04 08:37

Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 'git remote show' regression on empty repository in 1.5.4
Message-ID: <7vd4qaanqv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vd4qaanqv.fsf%40gitster.siamese.dyndns.org
In-Reply-To: <20080304060036.GA17106@spearce.org>

```
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:

>  It will cause a merge conflict against `master` as there is a
>  change there to invoke transport_disconnect(transport) before
>  displaying the refs.
>
>  Since the disconnect patch is not in maint, but this is a current
>  regression in 1.5.4.3, I'm sending you a conflicting patch.  :)

That's perfectly fine.  Merging is what maintainers do.


```
