threads / patch / 12127

patch, 6 partsdiff.c: remove useless check for value != NULL

Subject: [PATCH 1/6] diff.c: remove useless check for value != NULL

## tl;dr

2 messages between Feb 16, 2008 and Feb 16, 2008. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 1people: 2as markdown or json

Christian Couder· Feb 16, 2008, 04:59 UTC · lore

It is not necessary to check if value != NULL before calling 'parse_lldiff_command' as there is already a check inside this function.

By the way this patch also improves the existing check inside
'parse_lldiff_command' by using:
	return config_error_nonbool(var);
instead of:
	return error("%s: lacks value", var);
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
---
 diff.c |   11 +++--------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
	This patch series can be applied on "master"
	on top of my "diff.c: strdup -> xstrdup" patch. 
	The first 3 patches apply cleanly on "next" though.
Show changes to diff.c +3 −8
diff --git a/diff.c b/diff.c
index e5db293..5640cbf 100644
--- a/diff.c
+++ b/diff.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int parse_lldiff_command(const char *var, const char *ep, const char *val
 	}
 
 	if (!value)
-		return error("%s: lacks value", var);
+		return config_error_nonbool(var);
 	drv->cmd = xstrdup(value);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -166,13 +166,8 @@ int git_diff_ui_config(const char *var, const char *value)
 	if (!prefixcmp(var, "diff.")) {
 		const char *ep = strrchr(var, '.');
 
-		if (ep != var + 4) {
-			if (!strcmp(ep, ".command")) {
-				if (!value)
-					return config_error_nonbool(var);
-				return parse_lldiff_command(var, ep, value);
-			}
-		}
+		if (ep != var + 4 && !strcmp(ep, ".command"))
+			return parse_lldiff_command(var, ep, value);
 	}
 
 	return git_diff_basic_config(var, value);
-- 
1.5.4.1.129.gf12af-dirty
Junio C Hamano· Feb 16, 2008, 07:14 UTC · re: Christian Couder · lore

Re: [PATCH 1/6] diff.c: remove useless check for value != NULL

Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> writes:
> 	This patch series can be applied on "master"
> 	on top of my "diff.c: strdup -> xstrdup" patch. 
>
> 	The first 3 patches apply cleanly on "next" though.
They are all 'maint' material as far as I can tell ;-)
Thanks.

← back to recent threads