# [PATCH] remove Obsoletes from cogito.spec.in 3 messages from 2005-07-12 to 2005-07-12. Participants: Chris Wright, Petr Baudis. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/1204 ## Chris Wright, 2005-07-12 00:33 Subject: [PATCH] remove Obsoletes from cogito.spec.in Message-ID: <20050712003345.GO19052@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20050712003345.GO19052%40shell0.pdx.osdl.net ``` This is leftover from early naming, and is no longer relevant. Signed-off-by: Chris Wright --- diff --git a/cogito.spec.in b/cogito.spec.in --- a/cogito.spec.in +++ b/cogito.spec.in @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ License: GPL Group: Development/Tools URL: http://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/cogito/ Source: http://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/cogito/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -Obsoletes: git BuildRequires: zlib-devel, openssl-devel, curl-devel BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root Prereq: sh-utils, diffutils, rsync, rcs, mktemp >= 1.5 ``` ## Petr Baudis, 2005-07-12 07:30 Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove Obsoletes from cogito.spec.in Message-ID: <20050712073022.GB6363@pasky.ji.cz> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20050712073022.GB6363%40pasky.ji.cz In-Reply-To: <20050712003345.GO19052@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> ``` Dear diary, on Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 02:33:45AM CEST, I got a letter where Chris Wright told me that... > This is leftover from early naming, and is no longer relevant. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wright Thanks, applied. BTW, Josh Boyer of Fedora suggested having the Provides: git line in cogito.spec.in as long as it comes with git bundled (which will be so until git stabilizes, doesn't break backwards compatibility once in a while, and gets into some regular and reasonably frequent release cycle). What do you think? -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ be careful, some twit might quote you out of context.. ``` ## Chris Wright, 2005-07-12 18:17 Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove Obsoletes from cogito.spec.in Message-ID: <20050712181710.GW19052@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20050712181710.GW19052%40shell0.pdx.osdl.net In-Reply-To: <20050712073022.GB6363@pasky.ji.cz> ``` * Petr Baudis (pasky@suse.cz) wrote: > where Chris Wright told me that... > > This is leftover from early naming, and is no longer relevant. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wright > > Thanks, applied. BTW, Josh Boyer of Fedora suggested having the > > Provides: git > > line in cogito.spec.in as long as it comes with git bundled (which will > be so until git stabilizes, doesn't break backwards compatibility once > in a while, and gets into some regular and reasonably frequent release > cycle). What do you think? Hmm, in an ideal world all of those stipulations are right around the corner. Also, if the split is done, then cogito can depend on a specific version of git-core, to help isolate against those upstream changes. The main thing then is getting any local changes you have pushed to Linus' git tree (if there are still any). Adding Provides is probably only useful if there's some other package that's relying on git being there (i.e. gitweb perhaps). I guess we can add that, and remove it when there's proper dependencies in order. May as well do git-core as is now done in git. thanks, -chris -- Mark cogito rpm package as providing git-core, since it currently does. Signed-off-by: Chris Wright --- diff --git a/cogito.spec.in b/cogito.spec.in --- a/cogito.spec.in +++ b/cogito.spec.in @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Source: http://kernel.org/pub/software/ BuildRequires: zlib-devel, openssl-devel, curl-devel BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root Prereq: sh-utils, diffutils, rsync, rcs, mktemp >= 1.5 +Provides: git-core %description GIT comes in two layers. The bottom layer is merely an extremely fast ```