# format-patch usage 2 messages from 2008-01-14 to 2008-01-14. Participants: William Morgan, Junio C Hamano. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/11612 ## William Morgan, 2008-01-14 00:40 Subject: format-patch usage Message-ID: <1200270370-sup-4560@south> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/1200270370-sup-4560%40south ``` Hi all, Two questions from a git neophyte about using format-patch: First, what's the point of adding the Signed-off-by footer, if you're the author of the patch? I can see the utility of the committer adding this, as a record of who committed it, but if you wrote a patch and are submitting it to the list, then you've presumably "signed off", haven't you? Or is there some subtle distinction between exploratory patches and "real" patches being made? Second, it seems like commentary about a patch can be placed after the "---" but before the "diff --git" lines. Is that correct? Is that accepted practice? It seems a little backwards to have the commit message first, then the commentary. Am I correct in assuming that git-apply ignores anything between those two lines, including the diff stat, and so that's the reason people put it there? Thanks, -- William ``` ## Junio C Hamano, 2008-01-14 01:02 Subject: Re: format-patch usage Message-ID: <7vmyr9nrsc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vmyr9nrsc.fsf%40gitster.siamese.dyndns.org In-Reply-To: <1200270370-sup-4560@south> ``` William Morgan writes: > Two questions from a git neophyte about using format-patch: Both come from the established kernel Documentation/SubmittingPatches convention. ```