# [STG PATCH] change usage string of refresh to not refer to removed options 2 messages from 2008-01-08 to 2008-01-09. Participants: Peter Oberndorfer, Karl Hasselström. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/11538 ## Peter Oberndorfer, 2008-01-08 20:43 Subject: [STG PATCH] change usage string of refresh to not refer to removed options Message-ID: <200801082143.53125.kumbayo84@arcor.de> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/200801082143.53125.kumbayo84%40arcor.de ``` for changing the patch author, commiter and description Signed-off-by: Peter Oberndorfer --- I saw this while doing the refresh --index patch. There was a discussion about bringing back refresh -e If that also brings back this options, please do not apply the patch:-) stgit/commands/refresh.py | 8 +++----- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/stgit/commands/refresh.py b/stgit/commands/refresh.py index 952b1b6..4695c62 100644 --- a/stgit/commands/refresh.py +++ b/stgit/commands/refresh.py @@ -31,11 +31,9 @@ usage = """%prog [options] [] Include the latest tree changes in the current patch. This command generates a new GIT commit object with the patch details, the previous -one no longer being visible. The patch attributes like author, -committer and description can be changed with the command line -options. The '--force' option is useful when a commit object was -created with a different tool but the changes need to be included in -the current patch.""" +one no longer being visible. The '--force' option is useful +when a commit object was created with a different tool +but the changes need to be included in the current patch.""" directory = DirectoryHasRepository() options = [make_option('-f', '--force', -- 1.5.4.rc2 ``` ## Karl Hasselström, 2008-01-09 07:20 Subject: Re: [STG PATCH] change usage string of refresh to not refer to removed options Message-ID: <20080109072036.GA28839@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20080109072036.GA28839%40diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk In-Reply-To: <200801082143.53125.kumbayo84@arcor.de> ``` Thanks! But ... On 2008-01-08 21:43:53 +0100, Peter Oberndorfer wrote: > for changing the patch author, commiter and description the first line in the commit message (which ends up being the Subject: line in the mail) should be a short and self-contained summary. No need to resend just because of that, though -- I can fix it up. > I saw this while doing the refresh --index patch. There was a > discussion about bringing back refresh -e If that also brings back > this options, please do not apply the patch:-) Resurrecting "refresh -e" is on my todo list. But until then, this is a good fix. -- Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com www.treskal.com/kalle ```