threads / discuss / 10905

gitk in a bare repo?

Subject: gitk in a bare repo?

## tl;dr

3 messages between Nov 17, 2007 and Nov 17, 2007.

replies: 2people: 2as markdown or json

Joakim Tjernlund· Nov 17, 2007, 15:09 UTC · lore

How do I tell gitk I am in a bare repo?

Matthias Kestenholz· Nov 17, 2007, 16:06 UTC · re: Joakim Tjernlund · lore

Re: gitk in a bare repo?

Hi Joakim,

2007/11/17, Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se>:

> How do I tell gitk I am in a bare repo?
>

The following command works for me:

$ ls foo.git $ GIT_DIR=foo.git gitk &

Joakim Tjernlund· Nov 17, 2007, 16:48 UTC · re: Matthias Kestenholz · lore

RE: gitk in a bare repo?

Show 17 quoted lines

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mk@feinheit.ch [mailto:mk@feinheit.ch] On Behalf Of 
> Matthias Kestenholz
> Sent: den 17 november 2007 17:06
> 
> Hi Joakim,
> 
> 2007/11/17, Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se>:
> > How do I tell gitk I am in a bare repo?
> >
> 
> The following command works for me:
> 
> $ ls
> foo.git
> $ GIT_DIR=foo.git gitk &
>

Ahh, didn't think of that. Tride passing --bare in diffrent ways

Thanks,
        Jocke