threads / patch / 10633

patchfix comment in strbuf.h to use correct name strbuf_avail()

Subject: [PATCH] fix comment in strbuf.h to use correct name strbuf_avail()

## tl;dr

2 messages between Nov 4, 2007 and Nov 4, 2007. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 1people: 2as markdown or json

Steffen Prohaska· Nov 4, 2007, 08:02 UTC · lore
Signed-off-by: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>
---
 strbuf.h |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Note, the patch is against Junio's pu.
    Steffen
Show changes to strbuf.h +3 −3
diff --git a/strbuf.h b/strbuf.h
index 9720826..e5cdd1e 100644
--- a/strbuf.h
+++ b/strbuf.h
@@ -24,11 +24,11 @@
  *
  *    strbuf_grow(sb, SOME_SIZE);
  *    // ... here the memory areay starting at sb->buf, and of length
- *    // sb_avail(sb) is all yours, and you are sure that sb_avail(sb) is at
- *    // least SOME_SIZE
+ *    // strbuf_avail(sb) is all yours, and you are sure that strbuf_avail(sb)
+ *    // is at least SOME_SIZE
  *    strbuf_setlen(sb, sb->len + SOME_OTHER_SIZE);
  *
- *    Of course, SOME_OTHER_SIZE must be smaller or equal to sb_avail(sb).
+ *    Of course, SOME_OTHER_SIZE must be smaller or equal to strbuf_avail(sb).
  *
  *    Doing so is safe, though if it has to be done in many places, adding the
  *    missing API to the strbuf module is the way to go.
-- 
1.5.3.4.464.ge1bc2
Pierre Habouzit· Nov 4, 2007, 08:56 UTC · re: Steffen Prohaska · lore

Re: [PATCH] fix comment in strbuf.h to use correct name strbuf_avail()

On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 08:02:21AM +0000, Steffen Prohaska wrote:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>
  Acked-By: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Show 30 quoted lines
> ---
>  strbuf.h |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Note, the patch is against Junio's pu.
> 
>     Steffen
> 
> diff --git a/strbuf.h b/strbuf.h
> index 9720826..e5cdd1e 100644
> --- a/strbuf.h
> +++ b/strbuf.h
> @@ -24,11 +24,11 @@
>   *
>   *    strbuf_grow(sb, SOME_SIZE);
>   *    // ... here the memory areay starting at sb->buf, and of length
> - *    // sb_avail(sb) is all yours, and you are sure that sb_avail(sb) is at
> - *    // least SOME_SIZE
> + *    // strbuf_avail(sb) is all yours, and you are sure that strbuf_avail(sb)
> + *    // is at least SOME_SIZE
>   *    strbuf_setlen(sb, sb->len + SOME_OTHER_SIZE);
>   *
> - *    Of course, SOME_OTHER_SIZE must be smaller or equal to sb_avail(sb).
> + *    Of course, SOME_OTHER_SIZE must be smaller or equal to strbuf_avail(sb).
>   *
>   *    Doing so is safe, though if it has to be done in many places, adding the
>   *    missing API to the strbuf module is the way to go.
> -- 
> 1.5.3.4.464.ge1bc2
> 
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

← back to recent threads