# git-merge performance

3 messages from 2007-10-16 to 2007-10-16. Participants: Andrew Morton, Andreas Ericsson.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/10320

## Andrew Morton, 2007-10-16 17:17

Subject: git-merge performance
Message-ID: <20071016101748.ff132685.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20071016101748.ff132685.akpm%40linux-foundation.org

```

My git-pulling script (git-1.4.2) seems to have got quite a bit slower
since the post-2.6.23 patchflood.  I just did a bit of poking and it's
git-merge which is taking most of the time.


Using git-watchdog as an example:

box:/usr/src/git26> cat .git/branches/git-watchdog 
git+ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wim/linux-2.6-watchdog-mm.git
box:/usr/src/git26> git reset --hard origin
box:/usr/src/git26> git fetch git-watchdog
box:/usr/src/git26> time git merge --no-commit 'test merge' HEAD FETCH_HEAD > /dev/null                  
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
git merge --no-commit 'test merge' HEAD FETCH_HEAD > /dev/null  47.03s user 26.53s system 97% cpu 1:15.67 total


Try git-md-accel:

box:/usr/src/git26> cat .git/branches/git-md-accel 
git://lost.foo-projects.org/~dwillia2/git/iop#md-for-linus
box:/usr/src/git26> time git reset --hard origin
git reset --hard origin  0.51s user 0.11s system 100% cpu 0.615 total
box:/usr/src/git26> time git fetch git-md-accel
git fetch git-md-accel  0.12s user 0.05s system 11% cpu 1.379 total
box:/usr/src/git26> time git merge --no-commit 'test merge' HEAD FETCH_HEAD > /dev/null                  
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
git merge --no-commit 'test merge' HEAD FETCH_HEAD > /dev/null  42.52s user 24.18s system 96% cpu 1:08.93 total


And git-unionfs:

box:/usr/src/git26> cat .git/branches/git-unionfs      
git+ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ezk/unionfs.git
box:/usr/src/git26> time git reset --hard origin
git reset --hard origin  0.52s user 0.09s system 100% cpu 0.611 total
box:/usr/src/git26> time git fetch git-unionfs      
git fetch git-unionfs  0.16s user 0.03s system 8% cpu 2.285 total
box:/usr/src/git26> time git merge --no-commit 'test merge' HEAD FETCH_HEAD > /dev/null                  
Automatic merge went well; stopped before committing as requested
git merge --no-commit 'test merge' HEAD FETCH_HEAD > /dev/null  42.81s user 24.86s system 96% cpu 1:09.98 total


Everything is in pagecache, and I just did git-repack -a -d;git
prune;git-fsck-objects --full.

Pulling 70-80 trees at a minute and a half each gets a bit dull ;)

```

## Andreas Ericsson, 2007-10-16 17:34

Subject: Re: git-merge performance
Message-ID: <4714F612.2010905@op5.se>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/4714F612.2010905%40op5.se
In-Reply-To: <20071016101748.ff132685.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

```
Andrew Morton wrote:
> My git-pulling script (git-1.4.2) seems to have got quite a bit slower
> since the post-2.6.23 patchflood.  I just did a bit of poking and it's
> git-merge which is taking most of the time.
> 

That's odd. If it had been the remote fetching it would have been
understandable. Is this also happening with more recent gits? I know there
are some significant performance-improvements in 1.5.3.4 (or below).

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231

```

## Andrew Morton, 2007-10-16 18:18

Subject: Re: git-merge performance
Message-ID: <20071016111825.5a142f00.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20071016111825.5a142f00.akpm%40linux-foundation.org
In-Reply-To: <4714F612.2010905@op5.se>

```
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:34:10 +0200
Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > My git-pulling script (git-1.4.2) seems to have got quite a bit slower
> > since the post-2.6.23 patchflood.  I just did a bit of poking and it's
> > git-merge which is taking most of the time.
> > 
> 
> That's odd. If it had been the remote fetching it would have been
> understandable. Is this also happening with more recent gits? I know there
> are some significant performance-improvements in 1.5.3.4 (or below).
> 

1.5.0 is no faster, but 1.5.3 appears to be seven times quicker.  Neato.

```
