From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 22:18:05 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: patch-id: fix accidental literal blocks Message-ID: In-Reply-To: kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com writes: > From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk > > All the final paragraphs on these three options are rendered as > literal blocks. The intent was surely to keep each of them wed to their > respective description list items. But the attempt at maintaining the > indentation level of the block causes each them to be interpreted as a > code block, since code blocks can be represented using indentation. > > We need to use list continuation (+) in order to keep them wed to > their blocks. > > There is also an unordered list which sandwiches two paragraphs on an > option. We don’t need to do anything about that since it attaches to the > description list item without list continuation (i.e. it is already > correct). But for consistency let’s use list continuation and an open > block on it. > > Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk > --- Thanks. Let me mark this for 'next'.