From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 17:41:47 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 0/2] status: show comparison with push remote tracking branch Message-ID: In-Reply-To: "Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget" writes: Here is a place for you to explain what helps people to decypher the differences since the previous iteration in Range-diff (which is not very easy to read). > cc: Chris Torek chris.torek@gmail.com cc: Yee Cheng Chin > ychin.macvim@gmail.com cc: "brian m. carlson" sandals@crustytoothpaste.net > cc: Ben Knoble ben.knoble@gmail.com cc: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" > kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com cc: Phillip Wood phillip.wood123@gmail.com > cc: Nico Williams nico@cryptonector.com cc: Patrick Steinhardt ps@pks.im I am not sure what good these lines are doing (to GGG). > Harald Nordgren (2): > refactor format_branch_comparison in preparation > status: show comparison with push remote tracking branch > > remote.c | 183 ++++++++++++++++++++------- > t/t6040-tracking-info.sh | 262 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 403 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > > > base-commit: d529f3a197364881746f558e5652f0236131eb86 > Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2138%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fahead_of_main_status-v20 > Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2138/HaraldNordgren/ahead_of_main_status-v20 > Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2138 > > Range-diff vs v19: > > 1: 451d7a4986 ! 1: bb3e00863b refactor format_branch_comparison in preparation > @@ remote.c: int format_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, struct strbuf *sb, > if (advice_enabled(ADVICE_STATUS_HINTS)) > strbuf_addstr(sb, > _(" (use \"git pull\" to update your local branch)\n")); > -@@ remote.c: int format_tracking_info(struct branch *branch, struct strbuf *sb, > - "and have %d and %d different commits each, " > - "respectively.\n", > - ours + theirs), > + } else { > + strbuf_addf(sb, > +- Q_("Your branch and '%s' have diverged,\n" > +- "and have %d and %d different commit each, " > +- "respectively.\n", > +- "Your branch and '%s' have diverged,\n" > +- "and have %d and %d different commits each, " > +- "respectively.\n", > +- ours + theirs), > - base, ours, theirs); > ++ "Your branch and '%s' have diverged,\n" > ++ "and have %d and %d different commits each, respectively.\n", > + branch_name, ours, theirs); > if (show_divergence_advice && > advice_enabled(ADVICE_STATUS_HINTS)) Could you not mix the ours+theirs thing into the same step? Either make it a standalone patch to clean up before or after your main 2 patches, or leave it totally outside the series and send it after this series settles.