From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 18:37:42 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Specify hooks via configs Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87ikbpwr13.fsf@collabora.com> Adrian Ratiu writes: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2026, Adrian Ratiu wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026, "brian m. carlson" wrote: >>> On 2026-02-18 at 22:23:44, Adrian Ratiu wrote: >>>> Hello everyone, >>>> >>>> v2 addresses all feedback received in v1. >>> >>> I ask because situations where the hook output is not handled gracefully >>> and hooks fight over output or where the existence of TTY on a file >>> descriptor is not preserved will result in bug reports and broken tests >>> for tools that use Git, which I think we'd all like to avoid. >> >> Hi Brian, >> >> Yes, this is all done already. Phillip Wood actually brought this TTY >> issue up in his review of the v1 parallel hooks series (many thanks). :) >> ... >> > Hi again Brian, > > v2 of the parallel series is out if you want to review it: > > https://lore.kernel.org/git/20260222002904.1879356-1-adrian.ratiu@collabora.com/T/#u > > P.S. I think your spam filter is blocking all my e-mails? I get this > reply from you: > > sandals@crustytoothpaste.net, ERROR CODE :554 - 5.7.1 > : Client host rejected: > CONN:SPAM > > Original-Recipient: rfc822; sandals@crustytoothpaste.net > Final-Recipient: rfc822; sandals@crustytoothpaste.net > Status: 554 > Action: failed > Last-Attempt-Date: 22 Feb 2026 00:30:10 GMT > Diagnostic-Code: 5.7.1 : Client host rejected: CONN:SPAM > Remote-MTA: dns; complex.crustytoothpaste.net So, shall we make this "hooks specified by config" advance, while expecting the parallelized execution to further evolve as a follow up series that will still be out of 'next' for now? Thanks.