From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:09:54 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: restore a space in unpack-objects usage
Message-ID: <xmqqy5592itp.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <1383255671-12784-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>

Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> writes:

> The commit 87b7b84 removed a space in the unpack-objects usage, which
> makes the synopsis a bit confusing. This patch simply restores it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt b/Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt
> index ff23494..817788e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-unpack-objects.txt
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ git-unpack-objects - Unpack objects from a packed archive
>  SYNOPSIS
>  --------
>  [verse]
> -'git unpack-objects' [-n] [-q] [-r] [--strict] <pack-file
> +'git unpack-objects' [-n] [-q] [-r] [--strict] < pack-file

Thanks; that change was indeed not intended.

Looking at synopsis sections for other commands that take their
input from the standard input (e.g. "git check-attr"), I think
we should make it clear that "pack-file" is not to be spelled as-is
at the same time, i.e.

	'git unpack-objects' [-n] [-q] [-r] [--strict] < <pack-file>