From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 21:50:29 GMT
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Sharness v1.0.0
Message-ID: <xmqqy467784a.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160614214655.GA22334@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> Yeah, I don't think it has kept up with our work. My statement above was
> "I don't think we'd _ever_ want to consider sharness the upstream, even
> if it were up to date", but obviously there would be a lot of work to
> even get it there.

I actually was a lot more optimistic when they started, and if it
were up to date, I would have at least tried to see what the damage
to our t/ part will be if we swapped t/test-lib{,-functions}.sh with
it, which was the original reason why I took a look until I found
out that it did not have some things.