From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:49:33 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] remote: check branch names Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4915a1ba-eda9-435b-b615-4f78c7fe25f7@gmail.com> phillip.wood123@gmail.com writes: > Thanks for the patch, I'll re-roll based on that. I wonder if we > really want to support "@{-N}" when setting remote tracking branches > though - should we be using INTERPRET_BRANCH_REMOTE instead when > calling strbuf_branchname()? Perhaps. Users try to use "-" in surprising places, though ;-)