From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 19:49:34 GMT Subject: Re: [GSoC PATCH] t9200: handle missing CVS with skip_all Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260311194002.190195-1-pabloosabaterr@gmail.com> Pablo Sabater writes: > CVS initialization runs outside a test_expect_success and when it > fails, the error report isn't good. > > Wrap CVS initialization in a skip_all check so when CVS initialization > fails, the error report becomes clearer. > > Move the Git repo initialization into its own test_expect_success instead > of being in the same CVS check. > > Signed-off-by: Pablo Sabater > --- > t/t9200-git-cvsexportcommit.sh | 18 +++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Makes sense. Will queue. Thanks. > diff --git a/t/t9200-git-cvsexportcommit.sh b/t/t9200-git-cvsexportcommit.sh > index a44eabf0d8..cba3b1a28a 100755 > --- a/t/t9200-git-cvsexportcommit.sh > +++ b/t/t9200-git-cvsexportcommit.sh > @@ -30,13 +30,17 @@ export CVSROOT CVSWORK GIT_DIR > > rm -rf "$CVSROOT" "$CVSWORK" > > -cvs init && > -test -d "$CVSROOT" && > -cvs -Q co -d "$CVSWORK" . && > -echo >empty && > -git add empty && > -git commit -q -a -m "Initial" 2>/dev/null || > -exit 1 > +if ! cvs init || ! test -d "$CVSROOT" || ! cvs -Q co -d "$CVSWORK" . > +then > + skip_all="cvs repository set-up fails" > + test_done > +fi > + > +test_expect_success 'git setup' ' > + echo >empty && > + git add empty && > + git commit -q -a -m Initial > +' > > check_entries () { > # $1 == directory, $2 == expected