From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 21:24:27 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] format-patch --signature-file <file>
Message-ID: <xmqqwqdeomes.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq61kyq1i5.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
>> index 9c80633..049493d 100755
>> --- a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
>> +++ b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
>> @@ -762,6 +762,38 @@ test_expect_success 'format-patch --signature="" suppresses signatures' '
>>  	! grep "^-- \$" output
>>  '
>>  
>> +cat >expect <<-\EOF
>> +
>> +Test User <test.email@kernel.org>
>> +http://git.kernel.org/cgit/git/git.git
>> +
>> +git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.git;a=summary
>> +
>> +EOF
>
> We have been trying not to do the above in recent test updates.  It
> would be nice if this set-up did not have to be outside of the usual
> test_expect_success structure.

It seems you sent v7 before I had a chance to comment on this one.
The above was merely "it would be nicer..." and I am OK as-is.  The
comments on the rest are a bit more serious, though.

Thanks.

>
>> +test_expect_success 'format-patch --signature-file=file' '
>> +	git format-patch --stdout --signature-file=expect -1 >output &&
>> +	check_patch output &&
>> +	sed -n -e "/^-- $/,\$p" <output | sed -e "1 d" | sed -e "\$d" | sed -e "\$d" >output2 &&
>
> Overlong line.  If we can't make this pipeline shorter, at least
> fold it to a reasonable length, e.g.
>
> 	sed -n -e ... <output |
>         sed -e '1d' -e "\$d" |
>         sed -e "\$d" >output2 &&
>
> or something.
>
> The SP between the address "1" and insn "d" looks somewhat funny and
> ugly, especially given that you write the other one "$d" without
> such a SP.  Was there a specific reason why it was needed?
>
> I would further think that renaming a few files and updating the way
> the check is done may make the whole thing easier to understand.
>
>  * rename the input for --signature-file to "mail-signature".
>
>  * keep the name "output" to hold the format-patch output, i.e.
>
>      git format-patch -1 --stdout --signature-file=mail-signature >output
>
>  * Instead of munging the "mail signature" part of the output too
>    excessively to match the input, formulate the expected output
>    using "mail-signature" as an input, i.e.
>
>      sed -e '1,/^-- $/d' <output >actual &&
>      {
> 	cat mail-signature && echo && echo
>      } >expect &&
>      test_cmp expect actual
>
> Alternatively, the third-bullet point above may want to be further
> future-proofed by using stripspace, e.g.
>
>     sed -e '1/^-- $/d' <output | git stripspace >actual &&
>     git stripspace <mail-signature >expect &&
>     test_cmp expect actual
>
> Thanks.