From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:20:02 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] apply: refuse touching a file beyond symlink Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20150130201620.GA4133@peff.net> Jeff King writes: > I had the impression that we did not apply in any arbitrary order that > could work, but rather that we did deletions first followed by > additions. But I am fairly ignorant of the apply code. No, you are thinking about the write-out of the finished result, which may have to turn existing directory to a file or vice versa on the filesystem, but that happens _after_ we decide what to turn into what else, completely in-core. And the decision to determine what the input _means_ should not depend on the order of patches in the input.