From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:26:06 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] ci: rename the library of common functions
Message-ID: <xmqqwoqizclt.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <c9631845104dd66e1be6df9f15eec2481089c85f.1539598316.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:

> From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
>
> The name is hard-coded to reflect that we use Travis CI for continuous
> testing.
>
> In the next commits, we will extend this to be able use Azure DevOps,
> too.
>
> So let's adjust the name to make it more generic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> ---

With many pieces still shared across these two CI systems, this
looks like an excellent move.

I was wondering if the other extreme of moving ci/* to ci/travis/*,
introducing ci/azure/* and sharing nothing was needed, but being
able to share meaning amount of set-up sounds quite good.