From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:48:29 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] merge options: add a conflict style member Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <48b2d5b1-a59f-44c3-94ba-e7f81913b7f5@gmail.com> phillip.wood123@gmail.com writes: > I agree it is confusing, Elijah renamed it from ll-merge.c relatively > recently 6723899932e (merge-ll: rename from ll-merge, 2023-05-16). It > looks like the idea was to group it with the other merge* files: That reasoning cuts both ways. When you are only interested in the upper level API functions, being able to skip ll-anything as "low level details" is a powerful thing. merge-ll & hash-ll separated far apart will make it impossible.