From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 06:41:51 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] test-lib: add the '--stress' option to run a test repeatedly under load
Message-ID: <xmqqva4788cw.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181206053525.GA29481@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> Each "wait" will try to collect all processes, but may be interrupted by
> a signal. So the correct number is actually "1 plus the number of times
> the user hits ^C".

Yeah and that is not bounded.  It is OK not to catch multiple ^C
that races with what we do, so having ane extra wait in the clean-up
procedure after receiving a signal like you suggested would be both
good enough and the cleanest solution, I think.

Thanks.