From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 22:28:09 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] mktag: use fsck instead of custom verify_tag() Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Junio C Hamano writes: > I do not see the "we do not want more than one blank line after the > header" in the original, which was one thing I was looking for after > seeing what 08/10 did. > >> + fsck_options.extra = 1; >> + fsck_options.error_func = mktag_fsck_error_func; Hmph, recent "released" versions of Git seems to be fine when --- >8 ------ >8 ------ >8 ------ >8 ------ >8 --- object 72ffeb997eaf999f6938b2a7e0d9a75dcceaa311 type commit tag tester tagger Junio C Hamano 1606860947 -0800 a message after a blank --- 8< ------ 8< ------ 8< ------ 8< ------ 8< --- is fed to their "git mktag". If I am not mistaken, we definitely want to drop the EXTRA_HEADER_BODY_NEWLINE check from 08/10, even though EXTRA_HEADER_ENTRY may be something we want to retain at least for some releases for backward compatibility.