From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 17:43:44 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] add-patch: classify '@' as a synonym for 'HEAD'
Message-ID: <xmqqv876sqwf.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqh6iqu73y.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> You decided to use is_rev_head() instead of user_meant_head(), so
> you'd need to update the above description to match, I think.

Having said this, I have a slight fear that normal users would
expect is_rev_head(X) to say "yes" for "master" when the current
branch is "master", though.  is_head(X) would have the same
downside.