From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 21:52:21 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] format-patch: assume --cover-letter for diff in multi-patch series Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5aebe520-e540-46b4-a887-af488fe2663a@gmail.com> Rubén Justo writes: > I'm curious, a test like: > > test_expect_success "format-patch --range-diff, implicit --cover-letter" ' > test_when_finished "rm v2-000?-*" && > test_must_fail git format-patch --no-cover-letter > -v2 --range-diff=topic main..unmodified > > isn't it confusing? It is, but what makes it confusing is that the title does not describe what it tests, no? It tests that --no-cover-letter disables implicit cover-letter generation even with the presence of --range-diff. In the context of t3206-range-diff.sh, we know we are talking about the "range-diff", and mention of "cover-letter" is a hint enough that the "format-patch" is involved, so perhaps titles like test_expect_success 'explicit --no-cover-letter defeats implied --cover-letter' and test_expect_success '--cover-letter is implied for multi-patch series' would be clear enough and convey what the tests are actually doing.