From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 17:10:33 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2025, #01; Sun, 3)
Message-ID: <xmqqv7n1zoc6.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <aJIBlIDto33lJEuK@pks.im>

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> So with that knowledge I'd rather do the safe thing and abort the
> transaction. It requires less hard-to-test logic and feels safer
> overall.
>
> If we agree on that I can send a final reroll that reverts back to the
> logic we had in v3, which did abort the transaction.

I guess both you and Peff also prefer code that is more maintainable
and easier to reason about, and I am with you two, so let's go back
to the approach of v3.

Thanks.