From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 19:56:27 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Avoid hardcoded "good"/"bad" bisect terms Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260514-bisect-terms-v4-0-b3e3cf1b06ce@schlaraffenlan.de> Jonas Rebmann writes: > While checking whether all output messages of git bisect were covered by > [PATCH 1/3] bisect: use selected alternate terms in status output I > found hardcoded good/bad refs leading to incompatibility of git > rev-parse --bisect with alternate bisect run terms. This is addressed by > [PATCH 3/3] rev-parse: use selected alternate terms to look up refs > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Rebmann > --- > Changes in v4: > - Always print bisect terms in single quote (Thanks, Junio) > - Split out quoting of bisect terms into separate commit >> - Link to v3: https://patch.msgid.link/20260417-bisect-terms-v3-0-d659fa547261@schlaraffenlan.de Having this "Link" is better than nothing, but it alone is not sufficient to help those who mechanise patch consumption with b4. https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/index.html Please make sure that your cover letter of the (i+1)th iteration [v(i+1) 0/N] is a reply to the cover letter of the i-th iteration [v(i) 0/M]. With that, anybody who has the i-th iteration can 1. Check out the i-th iteration, e.g., $ git checkout jr/bisect-custom-terms-in-output 2. Peek at any of the commits on the topic branch with notes/amlog e.g., $ git notes --ref=amlog show HEAD 3. Check out the base, e.g., $ git checkout --detach master... Note that the branch that holds the i-th iteration can now be accessed via @{-1} (i.e., the branch previously checked out). 4. Tell B4 to fetch the latest round of the same series, by giving one/any of the message-ID we learned earlier, and apply them. $ b4 am -o- \ "<20260417-bisect-terms-v3-2-d659fa547261@schlaraffenlan.de>" | git am -s 5. See what changed with range-diff $ git range-diff @{-1}... 6. When satisified, replace the topic with the new iteration. $ git checkout -B @{-1} It is crucial that b4 can find the newer iteration when given a message-ID from the older iteration in step 4 for this workflow to work, and for that, [v4 0/3] must be a reply to [v3 0/2]. Otherwise b4 will say that v3 is still the last iteration and we cannot make progress. > Changes in v3: > - when referencing newly introduced terms, reference them in single > quotes (Thanks, Phillip) > - Prefer test_grep over grep in updated Tests (Thanks, Phillip) > - Improve commit messages (Thanks, Phillip) > - Don't leak memory after read_bisect_terms() (Thanks, Phillip) > - Don't leak memory after xstrfmt() (Thanks, Junio) > - Add test case to patch 2/2 > - Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20260323-bisect-terms-v2-0-8d6bdb2c9c7e@schlaraffenlan.de With these improvements, v3 was already in a quite good shape, but the latest makes it look even better. Will replace. Thanks.