From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:10:46 GMT
Subject: Re: New directory lost by git am
Message-ID: <xmqqtxbch361.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140305171334.GA31252@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> But I have not thought hard about it, so maybe there is a good reason
> not to (it is a little weird just because the resulting index is a
> partial application of the patch).

Originally ".rej" was a deliberate attempt to be "not very Git but
more like 'patch'", so I wouldn't be surprised if the combination
between "--reject" and "--index" did not work, in the sense that we
did not add such a partial change to the index.

I do not offhand think of a reason to forbid the combination,
though, as long as we make sure that "git apply --index --reject"
still exits with failure to prevent a partial application to be
auto-committed.