From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 05:18:31 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-completion: add stashes for gitk
Message-ID: <xmqqtwxoxil4.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANAO8VEUu9erxMLU523vQhg1hyfwVASH-Ng6YGKTN0RiB+H9FQ@mail.gmail.com>

Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik <sveinung84@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

>> A bigger question is why this change is made to gitk completion.  If
>> this completion were useful for "gitk", wouoldn't it be equally
>> useful for "git log"?
> I must admit that I didn't know that "git log" could display the
> content of a stashed change. After trying "git log -p -m stash@{0}" I
> would say that adding stashes for "git log" would be slightly less
> useful.

Yeah, it would not be so useful to dig with "log" beyond the commit
that each stash entry is based on.  But imagine "git show stash@{....}"
or "git log -g stash@{0}"?