From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:40:52 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/14] i18n: add--interactive: mark plural strings
Message-ID: <xmqqtwc8kwqz.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20161010125449.7929-6-vascomalmeida@sapo.pt>

Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> writes:

> @@ -669,12 +669,18 @@ sub status_cmd {
>  sub say_n_paths {
>  	my $did = shift @_;
>  	my $cnt = scalar @_;
> -	print "$did ";
> -	if (1 < $cnt) {
> -		print "$cnt paths\n";
> -	}
> -	else {
> -		print "one path\n";
> +	if ($did eq 'added') {
> +		printf(__n("added %d path\n", "added %d paths\n",
> +			   $cnt), $cnt);
> +	} elsif ($did eq 'updated') {
> +		printf(__n("updated %d path\n", "updated %d paths\n",
> +			   $cnt), $cnt);
> +	} elsif ($did eq 'reverted') {
> +		printf(__n("reverted %d path\n", "reverted %d paths\n",
> +			   $cnt), $cnt);
> +	} else {
> +		printf(__n("touched %d path\n", "touched %d paths\n",
> +			   $cnt), $cnt);
>  	}
>  }

Nice to see you covered all verbs currently in use and then
future-proofed by adding a fallback "touched" here.

Thanks.