From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 22:04:21 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] cat-file: rename variables in ref-filter Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <01020160db067bde-7f500636-b80e-4099-a84e-2613126c9aa1-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> Olga Telezhnaya writes: > Rename some variables for easier reading. > They point not to values, but to arrays. Once the code is written and people start to build on top, a change like this is not worth the code churn, especially because there are two equally valid schools of naming convention. - When you have an array, each of whose 20 slots holds a single dosh, I would prefer to call the array dosh[20], not doshes[20], so that I can refer to the seventh dosh as "dosh[7]". - If you more often refer to the array as a whole (than you refer to individual elements) and want to stress the fact that the array holds multiple elements in it, I can understand that you may be tempted to call the whole array "doshes[]". So please drop this and other "rename variables" patches from the series.