From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 15:55:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] builtin/receive-pack: use check_signature from gpg-interface
Message-ID: <xmqqtvp8flok.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180709101854.2777aae2@md1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net>

Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com> writes:

> I think 1 and 2 can be seen as somewhat unrelated to the gpgsm feature,
> they are more general refactoring. So i think picking them is a good
> idea. It will make the series shorter and ease review in the next round.

Surely, resending from patch 3 and upwards labelled as "add support
for gpgsm", saying that the topic depends on a different topic
branch named $X in my tree (after $X actually gets pushed out,
preferrably as part of 'next'---which is a promise that the changes
won't see any more drastic rewrites), is a good approach.

Thanks.