From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 23:37:44 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] t4124: fix test for non-compliant diff(1)
Message-ID: <xmqqtv2dz5mf.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2003242328380.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> With this explanation, I totally agree that your patch is better than
> mine.

Meaning that we'd have a fallback checker that understands "diff -u"
output, because the presense of "diff -u" cannot be relied upon and
we'd need to keep the original that understands "diff -c" anyway?

If that is what you meant, I am 100% fine with that.