From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:57:57 GMT Subject: Re: Visualizing merge conflicts after the fact (using kdiff3) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5582B8EC.1060205@drmicha.warpmail.net> Michael J Gruber writes: > This type of request comes up often (for a reason). I'm wondering > whether we could support it more systematically, either by exposing the > steps above as a command, or by storing the unresolved merge somewhere > (leveraging stash or rerere). Perhaps 'tr/remerge-diff' (on 'pu') is of interest?