From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:34:19 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] pack-protocol.txt: Mark all LFs in push-cert as required Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Dave Borowitz writes: > Another way of looking at the problem with my assumptions is, I was > assuming "pkt-line framing" was the same thing as "pkt-line header". > You seem to be saying the definition of "pkt-line framing" is "header, > and optional trailing newline". Yes. I thought that was what "Server SHOULD terminate with LF; client MUST NOT require it" in the existing text meant. Ah, that reminds me of one thing I already said elsewhere. We need to correct the above with s/Server/Sender/; s/Client/Receiver/; I think.