From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 23:44:38 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] t3701: avoid one-shot export for shell functions Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5536b336-5122-47fd-be57-42c299abe60c@gmail.com> Rubén Justo writes: > The common construct: > > VAR=VAL command args > > it's a common way to define one-shot variables within the scope of > executing a "command". "it's a" -> "is a". "define" -> "set and export". > However, when "command" is a function which in turn executes the > "command", the behavior varies depending on the shell: > > ** Bash 5.2.21 ** > > $ f () { bash -c 'echo A=$A'; } > $ A=1 f > A=1 > > ** dash 0.5.12-9 ** > > $ f () { bash -c 'echo A=$A'; } > $ A=1 f > A=1 > > ** dash 0.5.10.2-6 ** > > $ f () { bash -c 'echo A=$A'; } > $ A=1 f > A= > > One of our CI jobs on GitHub Actions uses Ubuntu 20.04 running dash > 0.5.10.2-6, so we failed the test t3701:51; the "git add -p" being > tested did not get our custom GIT_PAGER, which broke the test. > > Work it around by explicitly exporting the variable in a subshell. Nicely described. > > Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo > --- > t/t3701-add-interactive.sh | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh b/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh > index c60589cb94..1b8617e0c1 100755 > --- a/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh > +++ b/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh > @@ -616,7 +616,11 @@ test_expect_success TTY 'P handles SIGPIPE when writing to pager' ' > test_when_finished "rm -f huge_file; git reset" && > printf "\n%2500000s" Y >huge_file && > git add -N huge_file && > - test_write_lines P q | GIT_PAGER="head -n 1" test_terminal git add -p > + test_write_lines P q | ( > + GIT_PAGER="head -n 1" && > + export GIT_PAGER && > + test_terminal git add -p > + ) > ' > > test_expect_success 'split hunk "add -p (edit)"' '