From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 23:36:20 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] transport: don't ignore git-receive-pack(1) exit code on atomic push
Message-ID: <xmqqsert5qx7.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <CANYiYbHGdJsTgdzJj1r4sPdTAcZCf3C-qA538fcXbD1jjB1BUw@mail.gmail.com>

Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> writes:

> If we want to print "Done" in porcelain mode when there are no
> errors. (In dry run mode, ref-update-errors should not be
> considered as errors, but the opposite should be regarded as errors).

Hmph, should we allow dry-run to deliberately behave differently
from the for-real execution?  Wouldn't it discard the primary value
of dry-run, to see if it is likely that an operation will succeed
(or fail)?