From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 06:18:56 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Modified flag field type in rev_list_info struct in bisect.h. There is no need for flag field to be signed, as it is not supposed to be used as decimal.
Message-ID: <xmqqr3ez5bcf.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kaF42yCFWdvqqDSAZbWmUo0UVJGbXCci1LF=ne+cixZ0A@mail.gmail.com>

Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:

> Maybe my exposure to the code was accidentally in a way such that
> I ever only saw the version without int.

The older part of the code tends to spell flag words with "unsigned"
without "int", which is primarily historical fault of mine.