From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 19:26:27 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] road to reentrant real_path
Message-ID: <xmqqr34ct4po.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170109182433.GC62878@google.com>

Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> writes:

> On 01/09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> writes:
>> 
>> >> How does this relate to the 5-patch real_path: series that has been
>> >> on 'next' since last year?
>> >
>> > The only difference should be in the first patch of the series which
>> > handles the #define a bit differently due to the discussion that
>> > happened last week.
>> >
>> > Here is the interdiff between v5 and 'origin/bw/realpath-wo-chdir':
>> 
>> Then can you make that an incremental patch (or two) with its own
>> log message instead?  It (or they) would look and smell like a
>> bugfix patch that follows up a change that has already landed.  As
>> you know, we won't eject and replace patches that are already in
>> 'next' during a development cycle.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>
> Yes I'll get right on that.

Thanks.  Will queue.