From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:48:50 GMT
Subject: Re: Fix for failing tests on Solaris
Message-ID: <xmqqr15fdedp.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <20220429160913.wogvmyxosctdlosz@carlos-mbp.lan>

Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com> writes:

>> --- git-2.35.1/config.mak.uname
>> +++ git-2.35.1/config.mak.uname
>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ ifeq ($(uname_S),SunOS)
>>         NEEDS_SOCKET = YesPlease
>>         NEEDS_NSL = YesPlease
>>         SHELL_PATH = /bin/bash
>> -       SANE_TOOL_PATH = /usr/xpg6/bin:/usr/xpg4/bin
>> +       SANE_TOOL_PATH = /usr/gnu/bin
>
> I haven't used Solaris for a while (since around OpenSolaris Indiana
> development stopped), but wouldn't this break in Solaris 10 and older?
>
>> Makes all tests but t7812 pass successfully. t7812 fails on locales and
>> utf-8 which do behave differently in Solaris.
>
> And additional fix for that (since you seem to have access to a fresh
> Solaris 11.4 installation at least), would be forthcomming.
>
> Wondering also if there is a way to plug one of those from Oracle Cloud
> through a GitHub actions so we could prevent future issues by including
> Solaris in our CI runs.

I do not think we want to take this patch until we know how exactly
the tests failing for Vladimir fail without GNUism, which we do not
want to rely on.  If a test by mistake used "sed -i -e '<script>'"
GNUism which /usr/xpg[46]/bin/sed does not support, for example, we
want to know about it, so that we can move away from such a use of
GNUism.

Thanks.