From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 18:20:39 GMT Subject: Re: Is anybody using .cirrus.yml? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Patrick Steinhardt writes: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 11:57:52AM +0200, Tuomas Ahola wrote: >> Carlo Arenas wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2026 at 11:41 PM Patrick Steinhardt wrote: >> > >> > > Anyway, if nobody runs it anymore we should remove it. But let's wait a >> > > few days for Carlo to answer in case he still does have a usecase for >> > > it before we send a patch to drop it. >> > >> > Thanks, but there is no reason to keep that file around AFAIK. >> > >> > Carlo >> >> Thanks both. May I have your acks please? > > I think it would help if you sent this as a separate patch. Otherwise, > this patch here is going to be very hard to discover for anybody who > isn't reading this thread. > >> -----8<----- >> Subject: [PATCH] CI: delete defunct Cirrus CI configuration > > s/CI:/ci:/ > >> Since b5a9d7afcd (CI: add FreeBSD CI support via Cirrus-CI, >> 2019-12-20), .cirrus.yml has powered Git's VM-based FreeBSD CI. >> >> However, with the shutdown of Cirrus CI on 2026-06-01, there >> don't seem to be any drop-in solutions available to support our >> usecase---while there exist tools in general to run Cirrus pipelines > > The three dashes are a bit funny, but okay. > >> locally, managing FreeBSD VMs doesn't appear to be covered. >> >> That renders .cirrus.yml completely nonfunctional. Delete it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tuomas Ahola > > Other than that this looks good to me. As said though, might make sense > to send this via a separate thread so that it becomes disocverable. Thanks. Yes, after showing "how about doing it this way?" patch late in a thread, starting a new and fresh topic with a polished (hopefully final) version is very much appreciated. I also should make it a habit to do so.