From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 21:41:06 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] git-am: support any number of signatures
Message-ID: <xmqqppe3d0ct.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141007213859.GB24508@peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> Optional parameters for arguments make backwards-compatibility tricky.
> In this case, the command:
>
>   git am -s mbox1 mbox2
>
> means "apply the patches from mbox1 and mbox2, and signoff the patches".
> Under your scheme, it now means "apply from mbox2, and use the trailer
> mbox1".

Thanks for saving me from typing ;-)