From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:32:52 GMT Subject: Re: [Breakage] 2.20.0-rc0 t1404: test_i18ngrep reports 1 instead of 0 on NonStop in one case Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20190212002705.GD13301@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > Hmm. We care to _some_ degree, since that's the condition we set up for > making sure that update-ref cannot take the lock. But it would probably > be fine to just confirm that we failed to take the lock. And there, > checking for just "Unable to create $Q.*packed-refs.lock" would be > sufficient. Yeah, that was what I was getting at. On top, we could also see "test -e" after noticing the failure but that probably does not help us prove anything.