From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 15:22:00 GMT
Subject: Re: Re* [PATCH 8/9] fast-export: respect the possibly-overridden default branch name
Message-ID: <xmqqpna42tt3.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqtuzg2twq.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> As I said already, I personally do not think that this needs to be a
> preparatory patch to anonymize 'master' that cannot be configured to
> something else into 'ref0'.  This will become necessary when we make
> the primary branch configurable, so I think it is easier to replace
> the counterpart to your [PATCH 8/9] in the original series with it
> in the v2 series.

Ah, I forgot to say, if you think it is easier to manage the main
set of patches for the topic to eject as much preparatory changes as
possible, I do not at all mind treating this as one of the
preparatory step and queue it separately, making the main series
depend on it.  I just wanted to say that it is not necessary, even
though it does not hurt.



> Regarding the update to the comment before this "special case", I
> would suggest to explain "why" not just "what".
>
> Thanks.